U. S. Sentencing Commission's 2005 Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics

Introduction

The data in this report pertain to cases sentenced both before and after the United States Supreme Court’s January 12, 2005, decision in Booker v. United States, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). The tables in this Sourcebook are organized into three sections:
• The first section consists of Tables 1-9, 55-61, and Figures A, B, and M, which contain basic, descriptive statistics for all of FY 2005 (October 1, 2004, through September 30, 2005).
• The second section consists of Tables 10-54, 57-59, and Figures C-M for the pre-Booker period of FY 2005 (October 1, 2004, through January 11, 2005).
• The third section consists of Tables 10-54, 57-59, and Figures C-M for the post-Booker period of FY 2005 (January 12, 2005, through September 30, 2005).

This is the tenth edition of the United States Sentencing Commission’s Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics. This Sourcebook contains descriptive statistics on the application of the federal sentencing guidelines and provides selected district, circuit, and national sentencing data. The volume covers fiscal year 2005 (October 1, 2004, through September 30, 2005, hereinafter “2005”). This Sourcebook together with the 2005 Annual Report constitutes the annual report referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 997, as well as the analysis, recommendations, and accounting to Congress referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 994(w)(3).

On June 24, 2004, the Supreme Court decided Blakely v. Washington1, invalidating a sentence imposed under the state of Washington’s sentencing guidelines statute. The decision held that the judicial application of an enhanced range under the Washington state guidelines violated the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial. The Court stated that it expressed no opinion on the federal sentencing guidelines, which were not before it.2 After the decision, however, federal circuit and district courts voiced varying opinions on the implications of the decision for federal sentencing. The Supreme Court accepted for expedited review two federal sentencing guideline cases, United States v. Booker and United States v. Fanfan3, to clarify the implications of the decision for the federal sentencing guidelines, and the Commission filed an amicus curiae brief in the case.

On January 12, 2005, the Supreme Court decided United States v. Booker4, applying Blakely to the federal guideline system and determining that the mandatory application of the federal sentencing guidelines violated the right to trial by jury under the Sixth Amendment. The Court remedied the Sixth Amendment violation by excising the provisions in the Sentencing Reform Act that made the federal sentencing guidelines mandatory, thereby converting the mandatory system that had existed for almost 20 years into an advisory one.

The Commission continued its statutory mission to collect data on sentencing decisions both before and after Booker. In 2005, the Commission received documentation on 72,462 cases sentenced under the guidelines. The Commission coded and assimilated the information from these sentencings into its comprehensive, computerized data collection system. Of these, 53,674 cases were sentenced after the Supreme Court decision in Booker.

Because Booker generated differences in sentencing practices and procedures, the Commission decided to create two datasets analyzing the federal sentences imposed in 2005. The first dataset contains cases sentenced between October 1, 2004, and January 11, 2005, the day before the Booker decision. During this period before Booker but following Blakely, courts arrived at different conclusions regarding the continued viability of the guidelines or did not apply those guidelines in a uniform fashion. In Booker, the Supreme Court instructed courts to consider the guidelines, but “tailor the sentence in light of other statutory concerns.” This instruction necessitated changes in the methodology used by the Commission in the collection and analysis of the data. Thus, the post-Booker dataset uses the new methodology to classify cases sentenced from January 12, 2005, through September 30, 2005.

Background

The Commission collects and analyzes data on guideline sentences to support its varied activities. As authorized by Congress, the Commission’s numerous research responsibilities include (1) the establishment of a research and development program to serve as a clearinghouse and information center for the collection, preparation, and dissemination of information on federal sentencing practices; (2) the publication of data concerning the sentencing process; (3) the systematic collection and dissemination of information concerning sentences actually imposed and the relationship of such sentences to the factors set forth in section 3553(a) of title 18, United States Code; and (4) the systematic collection and dissemination of information regarding the effectiveness of sentences imposed (28 U.S.C. § 995(a)(12) and (14) through (16) inclusive).

The Sentencing Commission maintains a comprehensive, computerized data collection system which forms the basis for its clearinghouse of federal sentencing information and which, in large part, drives the agency’s research mission.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(w) (as amended by section 401(h) of the PROTECT Act, which became effective April 30, 2003), each chief judge of a district is required to ensure that within 30 days after entry of judgment in a criminal case, the sentencing court submits a report of sentence to the Commission that includes: (1) the judgment and commitment order; (2) the statement of reasons (including the reasons for any departures); (3) any plea agreement; (4) the indictment or other charging document; (5) the presentence report; and (6) any other information the Commission needs.

Data from these documents are extracted and coded for input into various databases. It should be noted that data collection is a dynamic rather than a static process. When research questions arise, the Commission either analyzes existing data or adds information to its data collection system.

The Commission’s computerized datasets, without individual identifiers, are available via tape and the Internet through the Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research at the University of Michigan (ICPSR) and the Federal Justice Statistics Resource Center.6

Datasets

<p>For each case in its <strong>Offender Dataset</strong>, the Commission routinely collects case identifiers, sentencing data, demographic variables, statutory information, the complete range of court guideline decisions, and departure information. Throughout 2005, the Commission continued to add data elements to its extensive computerized datafile on defendants sentenced under the guidelines. In addition to its standard data collection, the Commission often codes additional variables to study various discrete issues (e.g., drug offenses, criminal history).</p><p>The Commission’s 2005 USSC Offender Dataset contains documentation on 72,462 cases sentenced under the Sentencing Reform Act between October 1, 2004, and September 30, 2005. A “case” is defined as one sentencing event for an individual defendant.</p><p>The <strong>Organizational Dataset</strong> captures information on organizations sentenced under Chapter Eight of the guidelines. The Commission collects available data on organizational structure, size, and economic viability; offense of conviction; mode of adjudication; sanctions imposed (including probation and court-ordered compliance programs); and application of the sentencing guidelines. The Commission received information on 187 organizations that were sentenced under Chapter Eight of the sentencing guidelines in 2005.</p><p>While the 2005 reporting year includes cases sentenced between October 1, 2004, and September 30, 2005, it is important to note that the offender and organizational data collected and analyzed in the <em>2005 Annual Report</em> and <em>2005 Sourcebook of Sentencing Statistics</em> reflect only cases reported to the Commission (i.e., guidelines cases for which the courts forwarded appropriate documentation to the Commission).</p><p>The <strong>Appeals Dataset</strong> tracks appellate review of sentencing decisions. Information captured in this module includes district, circuit, date of opinion, sentencing issues, and the appellate court’s disposition.<sup>7</sup> The Commission also tracks final opinions and orders, both published and unpublished, in federal criminal appeals. In 2005, the Commission gathered information on 7,813 appellate court cases.</p><p>The appeals data system uses both the “group” and the “defendant” units of analysis. Each group comprises individual records representing all codefendants participating in a consolidated appeal. Each defendant’s record comprises the sentencing-related issues corresponding to that particular defendant. These records, linked together by a unique Commission-assigned appeals identification number, constitute a single group.</p><p><sup>1</sup> 542 U.S. 296 (2004)<br /> <sup>2</sup><em>Id</em>. at 304, n.9.<br /> <sup>3</sup> 542 U.S. 956 (2004).<br /> <sup>4</sup> 543 U.S. 220 (2005).<br /> <sup>5</sup><em> Id</em>. at 245.<br /> <sup>6</sup> Commission datasets can be accessed using the Internet address http://www.ICPSR.umich.edu/ or http://fjsrc.urban.org/index.cfm.<br /> <sup>7</sup> In 1992, the Commission implemented a data collection system to track appellate review of sentencing decisions. Each fiscal year, data collection for appellate review is accomplished by a three-step method. First, many appellate courts submit slip opinions of both published and unpublished opinions and orders directly to the Commission. The Commission creates a master list of these opinions as they are received. Second, the Commission performs a supplemental computer search for all published and unpublished opinions and orders using commercially available legal databases, and adds any available decisions not received directly from the courts to the master list. Last, because courts do not submit all relevant opinions and orders to commercially available legal databases, the Commission checks individual court websites and adds any available cases from the fiscal year. This three-step method may not provide the Commission with all of the appellate sentencing decisions rendered in a fiscal year. The Commission’s Appeals Database, therefore, may not report the universe of appellate decisions rendered in that fiscal year.</p>

Tables and Figures

Circuit and District Statistics
Table 1
Document Submission Rate of Each Circuit and District
Table 1A
Document Submission Rate of Each Circuit and District
Table 2
Guideline Offenders in Each Circuit and District

Primary Offense and Offender Characteristics
Figure A
Distribution of Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 3
Guideline Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Figure B
Number of Guideline Offenders in Selected Offense Types
Table 4
Race of Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 5
Gender of Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 6
Age Of Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 7
Age Race and Gender of Offenders
Table 8
Education of Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 9
Citizenship of Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category

Sentencing Appeals
Table 55
Types of Appeal in Each Circuit and District
Table 56
Disposition of Defendant Sentencing Appeals in Each Circuit and District
Table 56A
Disposition of Government Sentencing Appeals in Each Circuit and District
Figure M
Type and Disposition of Appeals Cases
Table 57
Guideline Involved in Issues Appealed by the Defendants
Table 58
Guideline Involved in Issues Appealed by the Government
Table 59
Sentencing Issues Appealed for Selected Guidelines
Table 60
Offense and Offender Characteristics of Appeals Defendants
Table 61
Average Length of Imprisonment for Appeals Defendants in Each Primary Offense Category

Sentencing Information (Pre-Booker)
Figure C
Guilty Pleas and Trial Rates
Table 10
Guilty Pleas and Trials in Each Circuit and District
Table 11
Guilty Pleas and Trials in Each Primary Offense Category
Figure D
Distribution of Offenders Receiving Sentencing Options
Table 12
Offenders Receiving Sentencing Options in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 13
Average Sentence Length in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 14
Average Length of Imprisonment for Offenders in Each Criminal History Category by Primary Offense Category
Figure E
Average Length of Imprisonment in Each General Crime Category
Table 15
Offenders Receiving Fines and Restitution in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 16
Type of Sentence Imposed on Offenders in Each Sentencing Zone
Figure F
Imprisonment Rates of Offenders Eligible for Non-Prison Sentences in Selected Offense Types

Guideline Application (Pre-Booker)
Table 17
Offenders Sentenced for Each Chapter Two Guideline
Table 18
Offenders Receiving Each Chapter Three Guideline Adjustment
Table 19
Offenders Receiving Acceptance of Responsibility Reductions in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 20
Offenders Receiving Chapter Four Criminal History Points
Table 21
Offenders in Each Offense Level and Criminal History Category
Table 22
Offenders Receiving Career Offender Armed Career Criminal Adjustments in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 23
Offenders in Each Guideline Sentencing Range

Departures and Sentences Within the Guideline Range (Pre-Booker)
Figure G
Percent of Offenders Receiving Each Type of Departure
Table 24
Reasons Given by Sentencing Courts for Departures Above the Guideline Range
Table 25
Reasons Given by Sentencing Courts for Other Departures Below the Guideline Range
Table 26
Guideline Departure Rate by Circuit and District
Table 26A
Downward Departure Rate by Circuit and District
Table 27
Offenders Receiving Departures in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 27A
Offenders Receiving Downward Departures in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 28
Offenders Receiving Departures in Each Primary Sentencing Guideline
Table 29
Within-Range Cases Position of Sentence for Offendersin Each Primary Offense Category
Figure H
Position of Sentence Within Sentencing Range for Selected Offenses
Table 30
Substantial Assistance Cases Degree of Departure for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 31
Government Sponsored Downward Departure Cases Degree of Departure for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 31A
Other Downward Departure Cases Degree of Departure for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 32
Upward Departure Cases Degree of Departure for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category

Drug Cases (Pre-Booker)
Figure I
Distribution of Guideline Drug Offenses
Table 33
Primary Drug Type of Offenders Sentenced Under Each Drug Guideline
Table 34
Race of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 35
Gender of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 36
Citizenship of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 37
Criminal History Category of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 38
Plea and Trial Rates of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 39
Weapon Involvement of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 40
Role Adjustment of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 41
Acceptance of Responsibility of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 42
Mean and Median Drug Amounts (In Grams) for Selected Base Offense Levels and Drug Types
Table 43
Drug Offenders Receiving Mandatory Minimums for Each Drug Type
Table 44
Drug Offenders Receiving Safety Valve and Mandatory Minimums for Each Drug Type
Table 45
Drug Offenders Receiving Departures for Each Drug Type
Figure J
Average Length of Imprisonment in Each Drug Type
Figure K
Distribution of Drug Type
Figure L
Mean Length of Imprisonment for Each Drug Type

Immigration Cases (Pre-Booker)
Table 46
Demographic and Offense Information for Immigration Offenses
Table 47
Age of Offenders Sentenced Under Immigration Guidelines
Table 48
Citizenship of Offenders Sentenced Under Immigration Guidelines
Table 49
Criminal History Category and Citizenship of Offenders Sentenced Under Immigration Guidelines
Table 50
Mean and Median Sentences of Offenders Sentenced under Immigration Guidelines by Departure Status

Organizational Sentencing Practices (Pre-Booker)
Table 51
Organizations Receiving Fines or Restitution by Primary Offense Category and Applicability of Chapter Eight Fine Guidelines
Table 52
Mean and Median Fine or Restitution Imposed on Sentenced Organizations by Primary Offense Category
Table 53
Chapter Eight Organizational Sentencing Components
Table 54
Organizations Sentenced Under Chapter Eight Culpability Factors

Sentencing Appeals (Pre-Booker)
Figure M
Type and Disposition of Appeals Cases
Table 57
Guideline Involved in Issues Appealed by the Defendants
Table 58
Guideline Involved in Issues Appealed by the Government
Table 59
Sentencing Issues Appealed for Selected Guidelines

Sentencing Information (Post-Booker)
Figure C
Guilty Pleas and Trial Rates
Table 10
Guilty Pleas and Trials in Each Circuit and District
Table 11
Guilty Pleas and Trials in Each Primary Offense Category
Figure D
Distribution of Offenders Receiving Sentencing Options
Table 12
Offenders Receiving Sentencing Options in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 13
Average Sentence Length in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 14
Average Length of Imprisonment for Offenders in Each Criminal History Category by Primary Offense Category
Figure E
Average Length of Imprisonment in Each General Crime Category
Table 15
Offenders Receiving Fines and Restitution in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 16
Type of Sentence Imposed on Offenders in Each Sentencing Zone
Figure F
Imprisonment Rates of Offenders Eligible for Non-Prison Sentences in Selected Offense Types

Guideline Application (Post-Booker)
Table 17
Offenders Sentenced for Each Chapter Two Guideline
Table 18
Offenders Receiving Each Chapter Three Guideline Adjustment
Table 19
Offenders Receiving Acceptance of Responsibility Reductions in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 20
Offenders Receiving Chapter Four Criminal History Points
Table 21
Offenders in Each Offense Level and Criminal History Category
Table 22
Offenders Receiving Career Offender Armed Career Criminal Adjustments in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 23
Offenders in Each Guideline Sentencing Range

Departures and Sentences Within the Guideline Range (Post-Booker)
Figure G
Percent of Offenders Receiving Each Type of Departure
Table 24
Reasons Given by Sentencing Courts for Departures Above the Guideline Range
Table 24A
Reasons Given by Sentencing Courts for Departures Above the Guideline Range With Booker 18 U S C 3553
Table 24B
Reasons Given by Sentencing Courts for Sentences Above the Guideline Range With Booker 18 U S C 3553
Table 24C
Reasons Given by Sentencing Courts for Remaining Sentences Above the Guideline Range
Table 25
Reasons Given by Sentencing Courts for Other Departures Below the Guideline Range
Table 25A
Reasons Given by Sentencing Courts for Departures Below the Guideline Range With Booker 18 U S C 3553
Table 25B
Reasons Given by Sentencing Courts for Sentences Below the Guideline Range With Booker 18 U S C 3553
Table 25C
Reasons Given by Sentencing Courts for Remaining Sentences Below the Guideline Range
Table 26
Sentences Relative to the Guideline Range by Circuit and District
Table 27
Sentences Relative to the Guideline Range by Each Primary Offense Category
Table 28
Sentences Relative to the Guideline Range by Each Primary Sentencing Guideline
Table 29
Within-Range Cases Position of Sentence for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Figure H
Position of Sentence Within Sentencing Range for Selected Offenses
Table 30
5K1 1 Substantial Assistance Departure Cases Degree of Decrease for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 30A
5K3 1 Early Disposition Program Departure Cases Degree of Decrease for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 31
Other Government Sponsored Downward Departure Cases Degree of Departure for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 31A
Departures Below the Guideline Range Degree of Decrease for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 31B
Departures Below the Guideline Range With Booker 18 U S C 3553 Degree of Decrease for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 31C
Below the Guideline Range With Booker 18 U S C 3553 Degree of Decrease for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 31D
All Remaining Below the Guideline Range Cases Degree of Decrease for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 32
Departures Above the Guideline Range Degree of Increase for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 32A
Departures Above the Guideline Range With Booker 18 U S C 3553 Degree of Increase for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 32B
Above the Guideline Range With Booker 18 U S C 3553 Degree of Increase for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 32C
All Remaining Above the Guideline Range Cases Degree of Increase for Offenders In Each Primary Offense Category

Drug Cases (Post-Booker)
Figure I
Distribution of Guideline Drug Offenses
Table 33
Primary Drug Type of Offenders Sentenced Under Each Drug Guideline
Table 34
Race of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 35
Gender of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 36
Citizenship of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 37
Criminal History Category of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 38
Plea and Trial Rates of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 39
Weapon Involvement of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 40
Role Adjustment of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 41
Acceptance of Responsibility of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 42
Mean and Median Drug Amounts (In Grams) for Selected Base Offense Levels and Drug Types
Table 43
Drug Offenders Receiving Mandatory Minimums for Each Drug Type
Table 44
Drug Offenders Receiving Safety Valve and Mandatory Minimums for Each Drug Type
Table 45
Drug Offenders Receiving Departures for Each Drug Type
Figure J
Average Length of Imprisonment in Each Drug Type
Figure K
Distribution of Drug Type
Figure L
Mean Length of Imprisonment for Each Drug Type

Immigration Cases (Post-Booker)
Table 46
Demographic and Offense Information for Immigration Offenses
Table 47
Age of Offenders Sentenced Under Immigration Guidelines
Table 48
Citizenship of Offenders Sentenced Under Immigration Guidelines
Table 49
Criminal History Category and Citizenship of Offenders Sentenced Under Immigration Guidelines
Table 50
Mean and Median Sentences of Offenders Sentenced under Immigration Guidelines by Departure Status

Organizational Sentencing Practices (Post-Booker)
Table 51
Organizations Receiving Fines or Restitution by Primary Offense Category and Applicability of Chapter Eight Fine Guidelines
Table 52
Mean and Median Fine or Restitution Imposed on Sentenced Organizations by Primary Offense Category
Table 53
Chapter Eight Organizational Sentencing Components
Table 54
Organizations Sentenced Under Chapter Eight Culpability Factors

Sentencing Appeals (Post-Booker)
Figure M
Type and Disposition of Appeals Cases
Table 57
Guideline Involved in Issues Appealed by the Defendants
Table 58
Guideline Involved in Issues Appealed by the Government
Table 59
Sentencing Issues Appealed for Selected Guidelines

Appendices

Appendix A (Pre-Booker)
Descriptions of Datafiles Variables and Footnotes

Appendix A (Post-Booker)
Descriptions of Datafiles Variables and Footnotes

Selected Sentencing Statistics by District - Pre-Booker
Pre-Booker
National
Pre-Booker
Alaska
Pre-Booker
Alabama Middle
Pre-Booker
Alabama Northern
Pre-Booker
Alabama Southern
Pre-Booker
Arkansas Eastern
Pre-Booker
Arkansas Western
Pre-Booker
Arizona
Pre-Booker
California Central
Pre-Booker
California Eastern
Pre-Booker
California Northern
Pre-Booker
California Southern
Pre-Booker
Colorado
Pre-Booker
Connecticut
Pre-Booker
District of Columbia
Pre-Booker
Delaware
Pre-Booker
Florida Middle
Pre-Booker
Florida Northern
Pre-Booker
Florida Southern
Pre-Booker
Georgia Middle
Pre-Booker
Georgia Northern
Pre-Booker
Georgia Southern
Pre-Booker
Guam
Pre-Booker
Hawaii
Pre-Booker
Iowa Northern
Pre-Booker
Iowa Southern
Pre-Booker
Idaho
Pre-Booker
Illinois Central
Pre-Booker
Illinois Northern
Pre-Booker
Illinois Southern
Pre-Booker
Indiana Northern
Pre-Booker
Indiana Southern
Pre-Booker
Kansas
Pre-Booker
Kentucky Eastern
Pre-Booker
Kentucky Western
Pre-Booker
Louisiana Eastern
Pre-Booker
Louisiana Middle
Pre-Booker
Louisiana Western
Pre-Booker
Massachusetts
Pre-Booker
Maryland
Pre-Booker
Maine
Pre-Booker
Michigan Eastern
Pre-Booker
Michigan Western
Pre-Booker
Minnesota
Pre-Booker
Missouri Eastern
Pre-Booker
Missouri Western
Pre-Booker
Mississippi Northern
Pre-Booker
Mississippi Southern
Pre-Booker
Montana
Pre-Booker
North Carolina Eastern
Pre-Booker
North Carolina Middle
Pre-Booker
North Carolina Western
Pre-Booker
North Dakota
Pre-Booker
Nebraska
Pre-Booker
New Hampshire
Pre-Booker
New Jersey
Pre-Booker
New Mexico
Pre-Booker
Northern Mariana Islands
Pre-Booker
Nevada
Pre-Booker
New York Eastern
Pre-Booker
New York Northern
Pre-Booker
New York Southern
Pre-Booker
New York Western
Pre-Booker
Ohio Northern
Pre-Booker
Ohio Southern
Pre-Booker
Oklahoma Eastern
Pre-Booker
Oklahoma Northern
Pre-Booker
Oklahoma Western
Pre-Booker
Oregon
Pre-Booker
Pennsylvania Eastern
Pre-Booker
Pennsylvania Middle
Pre-Booker
Pennsylvania Western
Pre-Booker
Puerto Rico
Pre-Booker
Rhode Island
Pre-Booker
South Carolina
Pre-Booker
South Dakota
Pre-Booker
Tennessee Eastern
Pre-Booker
Tennessee Middle
Pre-Booker
Tennessee Western
Pre-Booker
Texas Eastern
Pre-Booker
Texas Northern
Pre-Booker
Texas Southern
Pre-Booker
Texas Western
Pre-Booker
Utah
Pre-Booker
Virginia Eastern
Pre-Booker
Virginia Western
Pre-Booker
Virgin Islands
Pre-Booker
Vermont
Pre-Booker
Washington Eastern
Pre-Booker
Washington Western
Pre-Booker
Wisconsin Eastern
Pre-Booker
Wisconsin Western
Pre-Booker
West Virginia Northern
Pre-Booker
West Virginia Southern
Pre-Booker
Wyoming

Selected Sentencing Statistics by District - Post-Booker
Post-Booker
National
Post-Booker
Alaska
Post-Booker
Alabama Middle
Post-Booker
Alabama Northern
Post-Booker
Alabama Southern
Post-Booker
Arkansas Eastern
Post-Booker
Arkansas Western
Post-Booker
Arizona
Post-Booker
California Central
Post-Booker
California Eastern
Post-Booker
California Northern
Post-Booker
California Southern
Post-Booker
Colorado
Post-Booker
Connecticut
Post-Booker
District of Columbia
Post-Booker
Delaware
Post-Booker
Florida Middle
Post-Booker
Florida Northern
Post-Booker
Florida Southern
Post-Booker
Georgia Middle
Post-Booker
Georgia Northern
Post-Booker
Georgia Southern
Post-Booker
Guam
Post-Booker
Hawaii
Post-Booker
Iowa Northern
Post-Booker
Iowa Southern
Post-Booker
Idaho
Post-Booker
Illinois Central
Post-Booker
Illinois Northern
Post-Booker
Illinois Southern
Post-Booker
Indiana Northern
Post-Booker
Indiana Southern
Post-Booker
Kansas
Post-Booker
Kentucky Eastern
Post-Booker
Kentucky Western
Post-Booker
Louisiana Eastern
Post-Booker
Louisiana Middle
Post-Booker
Louisiana Western
Post-Booker
Massachusetts
Post-Booker
Maryland
Post-Booker
Maine
Post-Booker
Michigan Eastern
Post-Booker
Michigan Western
Post-Booker
Minnesota
Post-Booker
Missouri Eastern
Post-Booker
Missouri Western
Post-Booker
Mississippi Northern
Post-Booker
Mississippi Southern
Post-Booker
Montana
Post-Booker
North Carolina Eastern
Post-Booker
North Carolina Middle
Post-Booker
North Carolina Western
Post-Booker
North Dakota
Post-Booker
Nebraska
Post-Booker
New Hampshire
Post-Booker
New Jersey
Post-Booker
New Mexico
Post-Booker
Northern Mariana Islands
Post-Booker
Nevada
Post-Booker
New York Eastern
Post-Booker
New York Northern
Post-Booker
New York Southern
Post-Booker
New York Western
Post-Booker
Ohio Northern
Post-Booker
Ohio Southern
Post-Booker
Oklahoma Eastern
Post-Booker
Oklahoma Northern
Post-Booker
Oklahoma Western
Post-Booker
Oregon
Post-Booker
Pennsylvania Eastern
Post-Booker
Pennsylvania Middle
Post-Booker
Pennsylvania Western
Post-Booker
Puerto Rico
Post-Booker
Rhode Island
Post-Booker
South Carolina
Post-Booker
South Dakota
Post-Booker
Tennessee Eastern
Post-Booker
Tennessee Middle
Post-Booker
Tennessee Western
Post-Booker
Texas Eastern
Post-Booker
Texas Northern
Post-Booker
Texas Southern
Post-Booker
Texas Western
Post-Booker
Utah
Post-Booker
Virginia Eastern
Post-Booker
Virginia Western
Post-Booker
Virgin Islands
Post-Booker
Vermont
Post-Booker
Washington Eastern
Post-Booker
Washington Western
Post-Booker
Wisconsin Eastern
Post-Booker
Wisconsin Western
Post-Booker
West Virginia Northern
Post-Booker
West Virginia Southern
Post-Booker
Wyoming