2005 Federal Sentencing Guidelines
CHAPTER SIX - PART A - PART
B - PLEA AGREEMENTS
§6B1.2. Standards for Acceptance
of Plea Agreements (Policy Statement)
(a) In the case of a plea agreement that includes the dismissal of any charges
or an agreement not to pursue potential charges (Rule 11(c)(1)(A)), the court
may accept the agreement if the court determines, for reasons stated on the
record, that the remaining charges adequately reflect the seriousness of the
actual offense behavior and that accepting the agreement will not undermine
the statutory purposes of sentencing or the sentencing guidelines.
However, a plea agreement that includes the dismissal of a charge or a plea
agreement not to pursue a potential charge shall not preclude the conduct underlying
such charge from being considered under the provisions of §1B1.3 (Relevant
Conduct) in connection with the count(s) of which the defendant is convicted.
(b) In the case of a plea agreement that includes a nonbinding recommendation
(Rule 11(c)(1)(B)), the court may accept the recommendation if the court
is satisfied either that:
(1) the recommended sentence is within the applicable guideline range; or
(2) (A) the recommended sentence departs from the applicable guideline range
for justifiable reasons; and (B) those reasons are specifically set forth
in writing in the statement of reasons or judgment and commitment order.
(c) In the case of a plea agreement that includes a specific sentence (Rule 11(c)(1)(C)),
the court may accept the agreement if the court is satisfied either that:
(1) the agreed sentence is within the applicable guideline range; or
(2) (A) the agreed sentence departs from the applicable guideline range
for justifiable reasons; and (B) those reasons are specifically set forth
in writing in the statement of reasons or judgment and commitment order.
Commentary
The court may accept an agreement calling for dismissal of charges or an
agreement not to pursue potential charges if the remaining charges reflect
the seriousness of the actual offense behavior. This requirement does not authorize
judges to intrude upon the charging discretion of the prosecutor. If the government’s
motion to dismiss charges or statement that potential charges will not be pursued
is not contingent on the disposition of the remaining charges, the judge should
defer to the government’s position except under extraordinary circumstances.
Rule 48(a), Fed. R. Crim. P. However, when the dismissal of charges
or agreement not to pursue potential charges is contingent on acceptance of
a plea agreement, the court’s authority to adjudicate guilt and impose
sentence is implicated, and the court is to determine whether or not dismissal
of charges will undermine the sentencing guidelines.
Similarly, the court should accept a recommended sentence or a plea agreement
requiring imposition of a specific sentence only if the court is satisfied
either that such sentence is an appropriate sentence within the applicable
guideline range or, if not, that the sentence departs from the applicable guideline
range for justifiable reasons (i.e.,
that such departure is authorized by 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b)) and those
reasons are specifically set forth in writing in the statement of reasons or
the judgment and commitment order. As set forth in subsection (d) of §5K2.0
(Grounds for Departure), however, the court may not depart below the applicable
guideline range merely because of the defendant’s decision to plead guilty
to the offense or to enter a plea agreement with respect to the offense.
A defendant who enters a plea of guilty in a timely manner will enhance the
likelihood of his receiving a reduction in offense level under §3E1.1
(Acceptance of Responsibility). Further reduction in offense level (or sentence)
due to a plea agreement will tend to undermine the sentencing guidelines.
The second paragraph of subsection (a) provides that a plea agreement that
includes the dismissal of a charge, or a plea agreement not to pursue a potential
charge, shall not prevent the conduct underlying that charge from being considered
under the provisions of §1B1.3 (Relevant Conduct) in connection with the
count(s) of which the defendant is convicted. This paragraph prevents a plea
agreement from restricting consideration of conduct that is within the scope
of §1B1.3 (Relevant Conduct) in respect to the count(s) of which the defendant
is convicted; it does not in any way expand or modify the scope of §1B1.3
(Relevant Conduct). Section 5K2.21 (Dismissed and Uncharged Conduct) addresses
the use, as a basis for upward departure, of conduct underlying a charge dismissed
as part of a plea agreement in the case, or underlying a potential charge not
pursued in the case as part of a plea agreement.
The Commission encourages the prosecuting attorney prior to the entry of
a plea of guilty or nolo contendere under
Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to disclose to the defendant
the facts and circumstances of the offense and offender characteristics, then
known to the prosecuting attorney, that are relevant to the application of
the sentencing guidelines. This recommendation, however, shall not be construed
to confer upon the defendant any right not otherwise recognized in law.
Historical Note: Effective
November 1, 1987. Amended effective November 1, 1989 (see Appendix
C, amendment 295); November 1, 1992 (see Appendix
C, amendment 467); November 1, 1993 (see Appendix
C, amendment 495); November 1, 2000 (see Appendix
C, amendment 604); October 27, 2003 (see Appendix
C, amendment 651).
