Of the 66,662 cases reported to the Commission in fiscal year 2025, 1,170 involved money laundering. Money laundering offenses have increased 41% since fiscal year 2021.1,2
Click the cover for the PDF handout or learn more below.
Individual and Offense Characteristics
- 77% of individuals sentenced for money laundering offenses were men.
- 35% were Hispanic, 29% were Black, 25% were White, and 11% were Other races.
- Their average age was 42 years.
- 75% were United States citizens.
- 71% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I).
- The median loss for these offenses was $446,049;3
- Less than 1% involved loss amounts of $6,500 or less;
- 27% involved loss amounts greater than $1.5 million.
- Sentences were increased for:
- knowing the laundered funds were proceeds of an offense involving a controlled substance, violence, weapons, national security, or the sexual exploitation of a minor (16%);
- conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1957 (engaging in monetary transactions in property derived from specified unlawful activity) (15%);
- a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (laundering of monetary instruments) (77%);
- the defendant was in the business of money laundering with no underlying conduct (5%);
- sophisticated laundering (11%);
- a leadership or supervisory role in the offense (19%);
- abusing a public position of trust or using a special skill (4%);
- obstructing or impeding the administration of justice (5%).
- Sentences were decreased for:
- minor or minimal participation in the offense (10%).
- minor or minimal participation in the offense (10%).
- The top five districts for money laundering offenses were:
- Southern District of Florida (75);
- Eastern District of Texas (53);
- Southern District of New York (50);
- Southern District of California (44);
- District of Massachusetts (37).
Punishment
- The average sentence length for individuals sentenced for money laundering offenses was 69 months.
- 90% were sentenced to prison.
- 25% were convicted of an offense carrying a mandatory minimum penalty; 49% of those individuals were relieved of that penalty.
Sentences Relative to the Guideline Range
- 55% of sentences for money laundering were under the Guidelines Manual.
- 25% were within the guideline range.
- 25% were substantial assistance departures.
- The average sentence reduction was 65%.
- The average sentence reduction was 65%.
- 1% were Early Disposition Program (EDP) departures.4
- The average sentence reduction was 61%.
- The average sentence reduction was 61%.
- 4% were some other downward departure.
- The average sentence reduction was 56%.
- The average sentence reduction was 56%.
- 25% were within the guideline range.
- 45% of sentences for money laundering were variances.
- 44% were downward variances.
- The average sentence reduction was 45%.
- The average sentence reduction was 45%.
- 1% were upward variances.
- The average sentence increase was 50%.
- 44% were downward variances.
- The average guideline minimum increased and average sentence imposed have fluctuated over the past five years.
- The average guideline minimum increased and decreased throughout the fiscal years. The average guideline minimum was 115 months in fiscal year 2021 and 110 months in fiscal year 2025.
- The average sentence imposed increased and decreased throughout the fiscal years. The average sentence was 69 months in fiscal year 2021 and in fiscal year 2025.
- The average guideline minimum increased and decreased throughout the fiscal years. The average guideline minimum was 115 months in fiscal year 2021 and 110 months in fiscal year 2025.
1 Money Laundering offenses include cases in which the individual was sentenced under §2S1.1 (Laundering of Monetary Instruments; Engaging in Monetary Transactions in Property Derived from Unlawful Activity).
2 Cases with incomplete sentencing information were excluded from the analysis.
3 The Loss Table was amended effective November 1, 2001 and November 1, 2015.
4 “Early Disposition Program” (or EDP) departures are departures where the government sought a sentence below the guideline range because the defendant participated in the government’s Early Disposition Program, through which cases are resolved in an expedited manner. See USSG §5K3.1.
SOURCE: United States Sentencing Commission, FY 2021 through FY 2025 Datafiles, USSCFY21-USSCFY25.

