Of the 66,662 cases reported to the Commission in fiscal year 2025, 965 involved government benefits fraud.1,2 Government benefits fraud offenses have increased 182% since fiscal year 2021.
Click the cover for the PDF handout or learn more below.
Individual and Offense Characteristics
- 62% of individuals sentenced for government benefits fraud were men.
- 57% were Black, 20% were White, 20% were Hispanic, and 3% were Other races.
- Their average age was 41 years.
- 90% were United States citizens.
- 72% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I).
- 56% received the adjustment at USSG §4C1.1 for zero criminal history points.
- The median loss for these offenses was $144,000;3
- 2% involved loss amounts of zero;
- 26% involved loss amounts greater than $550,000.
- Sentences were increased for:
- the number of victims or the extent of harm to victims (15%);4
- using sophisticated means to execute or conceal the offense (13%);
- using an unauthorized means of identification (18%);
- fraud or theft in connection with a major disaster or emergency (22%);
- a leadership or supervisory role in the offense (7%);
- abusing a public position of trust or using a special skill (3%);
- obstructing or impeding the administration of justice (2%).
- Sentences were decreased for:
- minor or minimal participation in the offense (4%).
- minor or minimal participation in the offense (4%).
- The top five districts for government benefits fraud were:
- District of Puerto Rico (64);
- Southern District of Florida (57);
- Eastern District of Texas (50);
- Middle District of Florida (42);
- Eastern District of Virginia (38).
Punishment
- The average sentence for individuals sentenced for government benefits fraud offenses was 16 months.
- 66% were sentenced to prison.
- 3% were convicted of an offense carrying a mandatory minimum penalty; 8% of those individuals were relieved of that penalty.
Sentences Relative to the Guideline Range
- 56% of sentences for government benefits fraud were under the Guidelines Manual.
- 41% were within the guideline range.
- 12% were substantial assistance departures.
- The average sentence reduction was 63%.
- The average sentence reduction was 63%.
- 3% were some other downward departure.
- The average sentence reduction was 59%.
- Less than 1% were an upward departure.5
- 41% were within the guideline range.
- 44% of sentences for government benefits fraud were variances.
- 43% were downward variances.
- The average sentence reduction was 64%.
- The average sentence reduction was 64%.
- 1% were upward variances.
- The average sentence increase was 55%.
- The average sentence increase was 55%.
- 43% were downward variances.
- The average guideline minimum and average sentence fluctuated over the past five years.
- The average guideline minimum was 20 months in fiscal year 2021 and 23 months in fiscal year 2025.
- The average sentence was 13 months in fiscal year 2021 and 16 months in fiscal year 2025.
- The average guideline minimum was 20 months in fiscal year 2021 and 23 months in fiscal year 2025.
1 Government benefits fraud includes cases in which the individual was sentenced under §2B1.1 (Larceny, Embezzlement, and Other Forms of Theft; Offenses Involving Stolen Property; Property Damage or Destruction; Fraud and Deceit; Forgery; Offenses Involving Altered or Counterfeit Instruments Other than Counterfeit Bearer Obligations of the United States) using a Guidelines Manual in effect on November 1, 2001 or later and where the offense conduct as described in the Presentence Report involved a false claim to the federal or a state government involving assistance programs from federal agencies.
2 Cases with incomplete sentencing information were excluded from the analysis.
3 The Loss Table was amended effective November 1, 2001 and November 1, 2015.
4 The Victims Table and Sophisticated Means adjustment were amended effective November 1, 2015.
5 The Commission does not report the average for categories with fewer than three cases.
6 “Early Disposition Program” (or EDP) departures are departures where the government sought a sentence below the guideline range because the defendant participated in the government’s Early Disposition Program, through which cases are resolved in an expedited manner. See USSG §5K3.1.
SOURCE: United States Sentencing Commission, FY 2021 through FY 2025 Datafiles, USSCFY21-USSCFY25.

