U. S. Sentencing Commission'’s 2004 Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics

Introduction

 

The data in this report pertain to cases sentenced both before and after the United States Supreme Court’s June 24, 2004, decision in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004). The tables in this Sourcebook are organized into three sections:
• The first section consists of Tables 1-9, 55-56A, 60-61 and Figures A-B which contain basic, descriptive statistics for all of FY 2004 (October 1, 2003, through September 30, 2004).
• The second section consists of Tables 10-54, 57-59, and Figures C-M for the pre-Blakely period of FY 2004 (October 1, 2003, through June 24, 2004).
• The third section consists of Tables 10-54, 57-59, and Figures C-M for the post-Blakely period of FY 2004 (June 25, 2004, through September 30, 2004).

This is the ninth edition of the United States Sentencing Commission’s Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics. This Sourcebook contains descriptive statistics on the application of the federal sentencing guidelines and provides selected district, circuit, and national sentencing data. The volume covers fiscal year 2004 (October 1, 2003, through September 30, 2004, hereinafter “2004”). This Sourcebook together with the 2004 Annual Report constitutes the annual report referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 997, as well as the analysis, recommendations, and accounting to Congress referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 994(w)(3).

Blakely v. Washington

On June 24, 2004, the Supreme Court decided Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004), a landmark case that invalidated a sentence imposed under the state of Washington’s sentencing guidelines statute. The decision held that the judicial application of an enhanced sentencing range under the Washington state guidelines violated the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial. The Court stated that it expressed no opinion on the federal sentencing guidelines, which were not before it. After the decision, however, federal circuit and district courts voiced varying opinions on the implications of the decision for federal sentencing. The Supreme Court accepted for expedited review two federal sentencing guidelines cases, United States v. Booker and United States v. Fanfan, to clarify the implications of the decision for the federal sentencing guidelines, and the Sentencing Commission filed an amicus curiae brief in the case.

The Commission received documentation on 70,068 cases sentenced in fiscal year 2004. Of these cases, 51,865 were sentenced prior to the Supreme Court decision in Blakely. The Commission coded and assimilated the information from these sentencings into its comprehensive, computerized data collection system.

The Commission also coded and assimilated the information from 18,203 sentencings conducted after Blakely. Because the mandatory nature of the guidelines was uncertain during the post-Blakely portion of fiscal year 2004, the Commission decided to create two datasets analyzing the federal sentences imposed in fiscal year 2004. One dataset contains cases sentenced between October 1, 2003, and June 24, 2004, the date of the Blakely decision. During this period, courts clearly were required by statute and by Supreme Court precedent to mandatorily apply the guidelines. From June 25, 2004, through September 30, 2004, courts post-Blakely arrived at different conclusions regarding the continued viability of the guidelines and did not apply those guidelines in a uniform fashion. As a consequence, the Commission could no longer rely upon the assumption that the guidelines had been mandatorily applied. Accordingly, the Commission created a separate dataset for the post-Blakely cases. This dataset analyzes cases sentenced from June 25, 2004, through September 30, 2004.

Summary

The volume covers fiscal year 2004 (October 1, 2003, through September 30, 2004, hereinafter “2004”).

Background

The Commission collects and analyzes data on guideline sentences to support its varied activities. As authorized by Congress, the Commission’s numerous research responsibilities include (1) the establishment of a research and development program to serve as a clearinghouse and information center for the collection, preparation, and dissemination of information on federal sentencing practices; (2) the publication of data concerning the sentencing process; (3) the systematic collection and dissemination of information concerning sentences actually imposed and the relationship of such sentences to the factors set forth in section 3553(a) of title 18, United States Code; and (4) the systematic collection and dissemination of information regarding the effectiveness of sentences imposed (28 U.S.C. § 995(a)(12) and (14) through (16) inclusive).

The Sentencing Commission maintains a comprehensive, computerized data collection system which forms the basis for its clearinghouse of federal sentencing information and which, in large part, drives the agency’s research mission.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(w) (as amended by section 401(h) of the PROTECT Act, which became effective April 30, 2003), each chief judge of a district is required to ensure that within 30 days after entry of judgment in a criminal case, the sentencing court submits a report of sentence to the Commission that includes: (1) the judgment and commitment order; (2) the statement of reasons (including the reasons for any departures); (3) any plea agreement; (4) the indictment or other charging document; (5) the presentence report; and (6) any other information the Commission needs.

Data from these documents are extracted and coded for input into various databases. It should be noted that data collection is a dynamic rather than a static process. When research questions arise, the Commission either analyzes existing data or adds information to its monitoring system.

The Commission’s computerized datasets, without individual identifiers, are available via tape and the Internet through the Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research at the University of Michigan (ICPSR) and the Federal Justice Statistics Resource Center.

Datasets

<p>For each case in its <strong>Offender Dataset</strong>, the Commission routinely collects case identifiers, sentencing data, demographic variables, statutory information, the complete range of court guideline decisions, and departure information. Throughout 2004, the Commission continued to add data elements to its extensive computerized datafile on defendants sentenced under the guidelines. In addition to its standard data collection, the Commission often codes additional variables to study various discrete issues (<em>e.g</em>., drug offenses, criminal history).</p><p>The Commission’s 2004 USSC Offender Dataset contains documentation on 70,068 cases sentenced under the Sentencing Reform Act between October 1, 2003, and September 30, 2004. A “case” is defined as one sentencing event for an individual defendant.</p><p>The <strong>Organizational Dataset</strong> captures information on organizations sentenced under Chapter Eight of the guidelines. The Commission collects available data on organizational structure, size, and economic viability; offense of conviction; mode of adjudication; sanctions imposed (including probation and court-ordered compliance programs); and application of the sentencing guidelines. The Commission received information on 130 organizations that were sentenced under Chapter Eight of the sentencing guidelines in 2004.</p><p>While the 2004 reporting year includes cases sentenced between October 1, 2003, and September 30, 2004, it is important to note that the offender and organizational data collected and analyzed in the 2004 Annual Report and 2004 Sourcebook of Sentencing Statistics reflect only cases reported to the Commission (i.e., guidelines cases for which the courts forwarded appropriate documentation to the Commission).</p><p>The<strong> Appeals Dataset</strong> tracks appellate review of sentencing decisions. Information captured in this module includes district, circuit, date of opinion, sentencing issues, and the appellate court’s disposition. The Commission also tracks final opinions and orders, both published and unpublished, in federal criminal appeals. In 2004, the Commission gathered information on 7,213 appellate court cases of which 2,102 were appeals of the “conviction only.”</p><p>The appeals data system uses both the “group” and the “defendant” units of analysis. Each group comprises individual records representing all codefendants participating in a consolidated appeal. Each defendant’s record comprises the sentencing-related issues corresponding to that particular defendant. These records, linked together by a unique Commission-assigned appeals identification number, constitute a single group.</p><p><sup>1</sup> Using the Internet address http://www.JCPSR.umich.edu/NACJD/archive.html or http://fjsrc.urban.org/ Commission datasets can be accessed.</p><p><sup>2</sup> In 1992, the Commission implemented a data collection system to track appellate review of sentencing decisions. Each fiscal year, data collection for appellate review is accomplished by a three-step method. First, many appellate courts submit slip opinions of both published and unpublished opinions and orders directly to the Commission. The Commission creates a master list of these opinions as they are received. Second, the Commission performs a supplemental computer search for all published and unpublished opinions and orders using commercially available legal databases, and adds any available decisions not received directly from the courts to the master list. Last, because courts do not submit all relevant opinions and orders to commercially available legal databases, the Commission checks individual court websites and adds any available cases from the fiscal year. This three-step method may not provide the Commission with all of the appellate sentencing decisions rendered in a fiscal year. The Commission's Appeals Database, therefore, may not report the universe of appellate decisions rendered in that fiscal year.</p><hr />

Contents

Circuit and District Statistics
Table 1
Document Submission Rate of Each Circuit and District
Table 1A
Document Submission Rate of Each Circuit and District
Table 2
Guideline Offenders in Each Circuit and District

Primary Offense and Offender Characteristics
Figure A
Distribution of Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 3
Guideline Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Figure B
Number of Guideline Offenders in Selected Offense Types
Table 4
Race of Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 5
Gender of Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 6
Age Of Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 7
Age Race and Gender of Offenders
Table 8
Education of Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 9
Citizenship of Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category

Sentencing Appeals
Table 55
Types of Appeal in Each Circuit and District
Table 56
Disposition of Defendant Sentencing Appeals in Each Circuit and District
Table 56A
Disposition of Government Sentencing Appeals in Each Circuit and District
Table 60
Offense and Offender Characteristics of Appeals Defendants
Table 61
Average Length of Imprisonment for Appeals Defendants in Each Primary Offense Category

Sentencing Information (Pre-Blakely)
Figure C
Guilty Pleas and Trial Rates
Table 10
Guilty Pleas and Trials in Each Circuit and District
Table 11
Guilty Pleas and Trials in Each Primary Offense Category
Figure D
Distribution of Offenders Receiving Sentencing Options
Table 12
Offenders Receiving Sentencing Options in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 13
Average Sentence Length in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 14
Average Length of Imprisonment for Offenders in Each Criminal History Category by Primary Offense Category
Figure E
Average Length of Imprisonment in Each General Crime Category
Table 15
Offenders Receiving Fines and Restitution in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 16
Type of Sentence Imposed on Offenders in Each Sentencing Zone
Figure F
Imprisonment Rates of Offenders Eligible for Non-Prison Sentences in Selected Offense Types

Guideline Application (Pre-Blakely)
Table 17
Offenders Sentenced for Each Chapter Two Guideline
Table 18
Offenders Receiving Each Chapter Three Guideline Adjustment
Table 19
Offenders Receiving Acceptance of Responsibility Reductions in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 20
Offenders Receiving Chapter Four Criminal History Points
Table 21
Offenders in Each Offense Level and Criminal History Category
Table 22
Offenders Receiving Career Offender Armed Career Criminal Adjustments in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 23
Offenders in Each Guideline Sentencing Range

Departures and Sentences Within the Guideline Range (Pre-Blakely)
Figure G
Percent of Offenders Receiving Each Type of Departure
Table 24
Reasons Given by Sentencing Courts for Departures Above the Guideline Range
Table 25
Reasons Given by Sentencing Courts for Other Departures Below the Guideline Range
Table 26
Guideline Departure Rate by Circuit and District
Table 26A
Downward Departure Rate by Circuit and District
Table 27
Offenders Receiving Departures in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 27A
Offenders Receiving Downward Departures in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 28
Offenders Receiving Departures in Each Primary Sentencing Guideline
Table 29
Within-Range Cases Position of Sentence for Offendersin Each Primary Offense Category
Figure H
Position of Sentence Within Sentencing Range for Selected Offenses
Table 30
Substantial Assistance Cases Degree of Departure for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 31
Government Sponsored Downward Departure Cases Degree of Departure for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 31A
Other Downward Departure Cases Degree of Departure for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 32
Upward Departure Cases Degree of Departure for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category

Drug Cases (Pre-Blakely)
Figure I
Distribution of Guideline Drug Offenses
Table 33
Primary Drug Type of Offenders Sentenced Under Each Drug Guideline
Table 34
Race of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 35
Gender of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 36
Citizenship of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 37
Criminal History Category of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 38
Plea and Trial Rates of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 39
Weapon Involvement of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 40
Role Adjustment of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 41
Acceptance of Responsibility of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 42
Mean and Median Drug Amounts (In Grams) for Selected Base Offense Levels and Drug Types
Table 43
Drug Offenders Receiving Mandatory Minimums for Each Drug Type
Table 44
Drug Offenders Receiving Safety Valve and Mandatory Minimums for Each Drug Type
Table 45
Drug Offenders Receiving Departures for Each Drug Type
Figure J
Average Length of Imprisonment in Each Drug Type
Figure K
Distribution of Drug Type
Figure L
Mean Length of Imprisonment for Each Drug Type

Immigration Cases (Pre-Blakely)
Table 46
Demographic and Offense Information for Immigration Offenses
Table 47
Age of Offenders Sentenced Under Immigration Guidelines
Table 48
Citizenship of Offenders Sentenced Under Immigration Guidelines
Table 49
Criminal History Category and Citizenship of Offenders Sentenced Under Immigration Guidelines
Table 50
Mean and Median Sentences of Offenders Sentenced under Immigration Guidelines by Departure Status

Organizational Sentencing Practices (Pre-Blakely)
Table 51
Organizations Receiving Fines or Restitution by Primary Offense Category and Applicability of Chapter Eight Fine Guidelines
Table 52
Mean and Median Fine or Restitution Imposed on Sentenced Organizations by Primary Offense Category
Table 53
Chapter Eight Organizational Sentencing Components
Table 54
Organizations Sentenced Under Chapter Eight Culpability Factors

Sentencing Appeals (Pre-Blakely)
Figure M
Type and Disposition of Appeals Cases
Table 57
Guideline Involved in Issues Appealed by the Defendants
Table 58
Guideline Involved in Issues Appealed by the Government
Table 59
Sentencing Issues Appealed for Selected Guidelines

Sentencing Information (Post-Blakely)
Figure C
Guilty Pleas and Trial Rates
Table 10
Guilty Pleas and Trials in Each Circuit and District
Table 11
Guilty Pleas and Trials in Each Primary Offense Category
Figure D
Distribution of Offenders Receiving Sentencing Options
Table 12
Offenders Receiving Sentencing Options in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 13
Average Sentence Length in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 14
Average Length of Imprisonment for Offenders in Each Criminal History Category by Primary Offense Category
Figure E
Average Length of Imprisonment in Each General Crime Category
Table 15
Offenders Receiving Fines and Restitution in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 16
Type of Sentence Imposed on Offenders in Each Sentencing Zone
Figure F
Imprisonment Rates of Offenders Eligible for Non-Prison Sentences in Selected Offense Types

Guideline Application (Post-Blakely)
Table 17
Offenders Sentenced for Each Chapter Two Guideline
Table 18
Offenders Receiving Each Chapter Three Guideline Adjustment
Table 19
Offenders Receiving Acceptance of Responsibility Reductions in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 20
Offenders Receiving Chapter Four Criminal History Points
Table 21
Offenders in Each Offense Level and Criminal History Category
Table 22
Offenders Receiving Career Offender Armed Career Criminal Adjustments in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 23
Offenders in Each Guideline Sentencing Range

Departures and Sentences Within the Guideline Range (Post-Blakely)
Figure G
Percent of Offenders Receiving Each Type of Departure
Table 24
Reasons Given by Sentencing Courts for Departures Above the Guideline Range
Table 25
Reasons Given by Sentencing Courts for Other Departures Below the Guideline Range
Table 26
Guideline Departure Rate by Circuit and District
Table 26A
Downward Departure Rate by Circuit and District
Table 27
Offenders Receiving Departures in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 27A
Offenders Receiving Downward Departures in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 28
Offenders Receiving Departures in Each Primary Sentencing Guideline
Table 29
Within-Range Cases Position of Sentence for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Figure H
Position of Sentence Within Sentencing Range for Selected Offenses
Table 30
Substantial Assistance Cases Degree of Departure for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 31
Government Sponsored Downward Departure Cases Degree of Departure for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 31A
Other Downward Departure Cases Degree of Departure for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category
Table 32
Upward Departure Cases Degree of Departure for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category

Drug Cases (Post-Blakely)
Figure I
Distribution of Guideline Drug Offenses
Table 33
Primary Drug Type of Offenders Sentenced Under Each Drug Guideline
Table 34
Race of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 35
Gender of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 36
Citizenship of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 37
Criminal History Category of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 38
Plea and Trial Rates of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 39
Weapon Involvement of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 40
Role Adjustment of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 41
Acceptance of Responsibility of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type
Table 42
Mean and Median Drug Amounts (In Grams) for Selected Base Offense Levels and Drug Types
Table 43
Drug Offenders Receiving Mandatory Minimums for Each Drug Type
Table 44
Drug Offenders Receiving Safety Valve and Mandatory Minimums for Each Drug Type
Table 45
Drug Offenders Receiving Departures for Each Drug Type
Figure J
Average Length of Imprisonment in Each Drug Type
Figure K
Distribution of Drug Type
Figure L
Mean Length of Imprisonment for Each Drug Type

Immigration Cases (Post-Blakely)
Table 46
Demographic and Offense Information for Immigration Offenses
Table 47
Age of Offenders Sentenced Under Immigration Guidelines
Table 48
Citizenship of Offenders Sentenced Under Immigration Guidelines
Table 49
Criminal History Category and Citizenship of Offenders Sentenced Under Immigration Guidelines
Table 50
Mean and Median Sentences of Offenders Sentenced under Immigration Guidelines by Departure Status

Organizational Sentencing Practices (Post-Blakely)
Table 51
Organizations Receiving Fines or Restitution by Primary Offense Category and Applicability of Chapter Eight Fine Guidelines
Table 52
Mean and Median Fine or Restitution Imposed on Sentenced Organizations by Primary Offense Category
Table 53
Chapter Eight Organizational Sentencing Components
Table 54
Organizations Sentenced Under Chapter Eight Culpability Factors

Sentencing Appeals (Post-Blakely)
Figure M
Type and Disposition of Appeals Cases
Table 57
Guideline Involved in Issues Appealed by the Defendants
Table 58
Guideline Involved in Issues Appealed by the Government
Table 59
Sentencing Issues Appealed for Selected Guidelines

Appendix A (Pre-Blakely)
Descriptions of Datafiles Variables and Footnotes

Appendix A (Post-Blakely)
Descriptions of Datafiles Variables and Footnotes

Selected Sentencing Statistics by District - Pre-Blakely
Pre-Blakely
National
Pre-Blakely
Alaska
Pre-Blakely
Alabama Middle
Pre-Blakely
Alabama Northern
Pre-Blakely
Alabama Southern
Pre-Blakely
Arkansas Eastern
Pre-Blakely
Arkansas Western
Pre-Blakely
Arizona
Pre-Blakely
California Central
Pre-Blakely
California Eastern
Pre-Blakely
California Northern
Pre-Blakely
California Southern
Pre-Blakely
Colorado
Pre-Blakely
Connecticut
Pre-Blakely
District of Columbia
Pre-Blakely
Delaware
Pre-Blakely
Florida Middle
Pre-Blakely
Florida Northern
Pre-Blakely
Florida Southern
Pre-Blakely
Georgia Middle
Pre-Blakely
Georgia Northern
Pre-Blakely
Georgia Southern
Pre-Blakely
Guam
Pre-Blakely
Hawaii
Pre-Blakely
Iowa Northern
Pre-Blakely
Iowa Southern
Pre-Blakely
Idaho
Pre-Blakely
Illinois Central
Pre-Blakely
Illinois Northern
Pre-Blakely
Illinois Southern
Pre-Blakely
Indiana Northern
Pre-Blakely
Indiana Southern
Pre-Blakely
Kansas
Pre-Blakely
Kentucky Eastern
Pre-Blakely
Kentucky Western
Pre-Blakely
Louisiana Eastern
Pre-Blakely
Louisiana Middle
Pre-Blakely
Louisiana Western
Pre-Blakely
Massachusetts
Pre-Blakely
Maryland
Pre-Blakely
Maine
Pre-Blakely
Michigan Eastern
Pre-Blakely
Michigan Western
Pre-Blakely
Minnesota
Pre-Blakely
Missouri Eastern
Pre-Blakely
Missouri Western
Pre-Blakely
Mississippi Northern
Pre-Blakely
Mississippi Southern
Pre-Blakely
Montana
Pre-Blakely
North Carolina Eastern
Pre-Blakely
North Carolina Middle
Pre-Blakely
North Carolina Western
Pre-Blakely
North Dakota
Pre-Blakely
Nebraska
Pre-Blakely
New Hampshire
Pre-Blakely
New Jersey
Pre-Blakely
New Mexico
Pre-Blakely
Northern Mariana Islands
Pre-Blakely
Nevada
Pre-Blakely
New York Eastern
Pre-Blakely
New York Northern
Pre-Blakely
New York Southern
Pre-Blakely
New York Western
Pre-Blakely
Ohio Northern
Pre-Blakely
Ohio Southern
Pre-Blakely
Oklahoma Eastern
Pre-Blakely
Oklahoma Northern
Pre-Blakely
Oklahoma Western
Pre-Blakely
Oregon
Pre-Blakely
Pennsylvania Eastern
Pre-Blakely
Pennsylvania Middle
Pre-Blakely
Pennsylvania Western
Pre-Blakely
Puerto Rico
Pre-Blakely
Rhode Island
Pre-Blakely
South Carolina
Pre-Blakely
South Dakota
Pre-Blakely
Tennessee Eastern
Pre-Blakely
Tennessee Middle
Pre-Blakely
Tennessee Western
Pre-Blakely
Texas Eastern
Pre-Blakely
Texas Northern
Pre-Blakely
Texas Southern
Pre-Blakely
Texas Western
Pre-Blakely
Utah
Pre-Blakely
Virginia Eastern
Pre-Blakely
Virginia Western
Pre-Blakely
Virgin Islands
Pre-Blakely
Vermont
Pre-Blakely
Washington Eastern
Pre-Blakely
Washington Western
Pre-Blakely
Wisconsin Eastern
Pre-Blakely
Wisconsin Western
Pre-Blakely
West Virginia Northern
Pre-Blakely
West Virginia Southern
Pre-Blakely
Wyoming

Selected Sentencing Statistics by District - Post-Blakely
Post-Blakely
National
Post-Blakely
Alaska
Post-Blakely
Alabama Middle
Post-Blakely
Alabama Northern
Post-Blakely
Alabama Southern
Post-Blakely
Arkansas Eastern
Post-Blakely
Arkansas Western
Post-Blakely
Arizona
Post-Blakely
California Central
Post-Blakely
California Eastern
Post-Blakely
California Northern
Post-Blakely
California Southern
Post-Blakely
Colorado
Post-Blakely
Connecticut
Post-Blakely
District of Columbia
Post-Blakely
Delaware
Post-Blakely
Florida Middle
Post-Blakely
Florida Northern
Post-Blakely
Florida Southern
Post-Blakely
Georgia Middle
Post-Blakely
Georgia Northern
Post-Blakely
Georgia Southern
Post-Blakely
Guam
Post-Blakely
Hawaii
Post-Blakely
Iowa Northern
Post-Blakely
Iowa Southern
Post-Blakely
Idaho
Post-Blakely
Illinois Central
Post-Blakely
Illinois Northern
Post-Blakely
Illinois Southern
Post-Blakely
Indiana Northern
Post-Blakely
Indiana Southern
Post-Blakely
Kansas
Post-Blakely
Kentucky Eastern
Post-Blakely
Kentucky Western
Post-Blakely
Louisiana Eastern
Post-Blakely
Louisiana Middle
Post-Blakely
Louisiana Western
Post-Blakely
Massachusetts
Post-Blakely
Maryland
Post-Blakely
Maine
Post-Blakely
Michigan Eastern
Post-Blakely
Michigan Western
Post-Blakely
Minnesota
Post-Blakely
Missouri Eastern
Post-Blakely
Missouri Western
Post-Blakely
Mississippi Northern
Post-Blakely
Mississippi Southern
Post-Blakely
Montana
Post-Blakely
North Carolina Eastern
Post-Blakely
North Carolina Middle
Post-Blakely
North Carolina Western
Post-Blakely
North Dakota
Post-Blakely
Nebraska
Post-Blakely
New Hampshire
Post-Blakely
New Jersey
Post-Blakely
New Mexico
Post-Blakely
Northern Mariana Islands
Post-Blakely
Nevada
Post-Blakely
New York Eastern
Post-Blakely
New York Northern
Post-Blakely
New York Southern
Post-Blakely
New York Western
Post-Blakely
Ohio Northern
Post-Blakely
Ohio Southern
Post-Blakely
Oklahoma Eastern
Post-Blakely
Oklahoma Northern
Post-Blakely
Oklahoma Western
Post-Blakely
Oregon
Post-Blakely
Pennsylvania Eastern
Post-Blakely
Pennsylvania Middle
Post-Blakely
Pennsylvania Western
Post-Blakely
Puerto Rico
Post-Blakely
Rhode Island
Post-Blakely
South Carolina
Post-Blakely
South Dakota
Post-Blakely
Tennessee Eastern
Post-Blakely
Tennessee Middle
Post-Blakely
Tennessee Western
Post-Blakely
Texas Eastern
Post-Blakely
Texas Northern
Post-Blakely
Texas Southern
Post-Blakely
Texas Western
Post-Blakely
Utah
Post-Blakely
Virginia Eastern
Post-Blakely
Virginia Western
Post-Blakely
Virgin Islands
Post-Blakely
Vermont
Post-Blakely
Washington Eastern
Post-Blakely
Washington Western
Post-Blakely
Wisconsin Eastern
Post-Blakely
Wisconsin Western
Post-Blakely
West Virginia Northern
Post-Blakely
West Virginia Southern
Post-Blakely
Wyoming