Sourcebook 2004

U. S. Sentencing Commission’s
Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics

2004 Sourcebook

Introduction

 

The data in this report pertain to cases sentenced both before and after the United States Supreme Court’s June 24, 2004, decision in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004). The tables in this Sourcebook are organized into three sections:
• The first section consists of Tables 1-9, 55-56A, 60-61 and Figures A-B which contain basic, descriptive statistics for all of FY 2004 (October 1, 2003, through September 30, 2004).
• The second section consists of Tables 10-54, 57-59, and Figures C-M for the pre-Blakely period of FY 2004 (October 1, 2003, through June 24, 2004).
• The third section consists of Tables 10-54, 57-59, and Figures C-M for the post-Blakely period of FY 2004 (June 25, 2004, through September 30, 2004).

This is the ninth edition of the United States Sentencing Commission’s Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics. This Sourcebook contains descriptive statistics on the application of the federal sentencing guidelines and provides selected district, circuit, and national sentencing data. The volume covers fiscal year 2004 (October 1, 2003, through September 30, 2004, hereinafter “2004”). This Sourcebook together with the 2004 Annual Report constitutes the annual report referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 997, as well as the analysis, recommendations, and accounting to Congress referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 994(w)(3).

Blakely v. Washington

On June 24, 2004, the Supreme Court decided Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004), a landmark case that invalidated a sentence imposed under the state of Washington’s sentencing guidelines statute. The decision held that the judicial application of an enhanced sentencing range under the Washington state guidelines violated the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial. The Court stated that it expressed no opinion on the federal sentencing guidelines, which were not before it. After the decision, however, federal circuit and district courts voiced varying opinions on the implications of the decision for federal sentencing. The Supreme Court accepted for expedited review two federal sentencing guidelines cases, United States v. Booker and United States v. Fanfan, to clarify the implications of the decision for the federal sentencing guidelines, and the Sentencing Commission filed an amicus curiae brief in the case.

The Commission received documentation on 70,068 cases sentenced in fiscal year 2004. Of these cases, 51,865 were sentenced prior to the Supreme Court decision in Blakely. The Commission coded and assimilated the information from these sentencings into its comprehensive, computerized data collection system.

The Commission also coded and assimilated the information from 18,203 sentencings conducted after Blakely. Because the mandatory nature of the guidelines was uncertain during the post-Blakely portion of fiscal year 2004, the Commission decided to create two datasets analyzing the federal sentences imposed in fiscal year 2004. One dataset contains cases sentenced between October 1, 2003, and June 24, 2004, the date of the Blakely decision. During this period, courts clearly were required by statute and by Supreme Court precedent to mandatorily apply the guidelines. From June 25, 2004, through September 30, 2004, courts post-Blakely arrived at different conclusions regarding the continued viability of the guidelines and did not apply those guidelines in a uniform fashion. As a consequence, the Commission could no longer rely upon the assumption that the guidelines had been mandatorily applied. Accordingly, the Commission created a separate dataset for the post-Blakely cases. This dataset analyzes cases sentenced from June 25, 2004, through September 30, 2004.

Background

The Commission collects and analyzes data on guideline sentences to support its varied activities. As authorized by Congress, the Commission’s numerous research responsibilities include (1) the establishment of a research and development program to serve as a clearinghouse and information center for the collection, preparation, and dissemination of information on federal sentencing practices; (2) the publication of data concerning the sentencing process; (3) the systematic collection and dissemination of information concerning sentences actually imposed and the relationship of such sentences to the factors set forth in section 3553(a) of title 18, United States Code; and (4) the systematic collection and dissemination of information regarding the effectiveness of sentences imposed (28 U.S.C. § 995(a)(12) and (14) through (16) inclusive).

The Sentencing Commission maintains a comprehensive, computerized data collection system which forms the basis for its clearinghouse of federal sentencing information and which, in large part, drives the agency’s research mission.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(w) (as amended by section 401(h) of the PROTECT Act, which became effective April 30, 2003), each chief judge of a district is required to ensure that within 30 days after entry of judgment in a criminal case, the sentencing court submits a report of sentence to the Commission that includes: (1) the judgment and commitment order; (2) the statement of reasons (including the reasons for any departures); (3) any plea agreement; (4) the indictment or other charging document; (5) the presentence report; and (6) any other information the Commission needs.

Data from these documents are extracted and coded for input into various databases. It should be noted that data collection is a dynamic rather than a static process. When research questions arise, the Commission either analyzes existing data or adds information to its monitoring system.

The Commission’s computerized datasets, without individual identifiers, are available via tape and the Internet through the Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research at the University of Michigan (ICPSR) and the Federal Justice Statistics Resource Center.

Datasets

For each case in its Offender Dataset, the Commission routinely collects case identifiers, sentencing data, demographic variables, statutory information, the complete range of court guideline decisions, and departure information. Throughout 2004, the Commission continued to add data elements to its extensive computerized datafile on defendants sentenced under the guidelines. In addition to its standard data collection, the Commission often codes additional variables to study various discrete issues (e.g., drug offenses, criminal history).

The Commission’s 2004 USSC Offender Dataset contains documentation on 70,068 cases sentenced under the Sentencing Reform Act between October 1, 2003, and September 30, 2004. A “case” is defined as one sentencing event for an individual defendant.

The Organizational Dataset captures information on organizations sentenced under Chapter Eight of the guidelines. The Commission collects available data on organizational structure, size, and economic viability; offense of conviction; mode of adjudication; sanctions imposed (including probation and court-ordered compliance programs); and application of the sentencing guidelines. The Commission received information on 130 organizations that were sentenced under Chapter Eight of the sentencing guidelines in 2004.

While the 2004 reporting year includes cases sentenced between October 1, 2003, and September 30, 2004, it is important to note that the offender and organizational data collected and analyzed in the 2004 Annual Report and 2004 Sourcebook of Sentencing Statistics reflect only cases reported to the Commission (i.e., guidelines cases for which the courts forwarded appropriate documentation to the Commission).

The Appeals Dataset tracks appellate review of sentencing decisions. Information captured in this module includes district, circuit, date of opinion, sentencing issues, and the appellate court’s disposition. The Commission also tracks final opinions and orders, both published and unpublished, in federal criminal appeals. In 2004, the Commission gathered information on 7,213 appellate court cases of which 2,102 were appeals of the “conviction only.”

The appeals data system uses both the “group” and the “defendant” units of analysis. Each group comprises individual records representing all codefendants participating in a consolidated appeal. Each defendant’s record comprises the sentencing-related issues corresponding to that particular defendant. These records, linked together by a unique Commission-assigned appeals identification number, constitute a single group.

1 Using the Internet address http://www.JCPSR.umich.edu/NACJD/archive.html or http://fjsrc.urban.org/ Commission datasets can be accessed.

2 In 1992, the Commission implemented a data collection system to track appellate review of sentencing decisions. Each fiscal year, data collection for appellate review is accomplished by a three-step method. First, many appellate courts submit slip opinions of both published and unpublished opinions and orders directly to the Commission. The Commission creates a master list of these opinions as they are received. Second, the Commission performs a supplemental computer search for all published and unpublished opinions and orders using commercially available legal databases, and adds any available decisions not received directly from the courts to the master list. Last, because courts do not submit all relevant opinions and orders to commercially available legal databases, the Commission checks individual court websites and adds any available cases from the fiscal year. This three-step method may not provide the Commission with all of the appellate sentencing decisions rendered in a fiscal year. The Commission's Appeals Database, therefore, may not report the universe of appellate decisions rendered in that fiscal year.


Contents

Tables and Figures

Topic Table/Figure Number
SECTION ONE: Fiscal Year 2004 Tables and Figures
(October 1, 2003, through September 30, 2004)
 
Circuit and District Statistics  
  Document Submission Rate of Each Circuit and District Table 1
  Document Submission Rate of Each Circuit and District Table 1A
  Guideline Offenders in Each Circuit and District Table 2
Primary Offense and Offender Characteristics  
  Distribution of Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category Figure A
  Guideline Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category Table 3
  Number of Guideline Offenders in Selected Offense Types Figure B
  Race of Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category Table 4
  Gender of Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category Table 5
  Age Of Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category Table 6
  Age, Race, and Gender of Offenders Table 7
  Education of Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category Table 8
  Citizenship of Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category Table 9
Sentencing Appeals  
  Types of Appeal in Each Circuit and District Table 55

 

Disposition of Defendant Sentencing Appeals in Each Circuit and District Table 56

 

Disposition of Government Sentencing Appeals in Each Circuit and District Table 56A

 

Offense and Offender Characteristics of Appeals Defendants Table 60

 

Average Length of Imprisonment for Appeals Defendants in Each Primary Offense Category Table 61
SECTION TWO: Pre-Blakely Tables and Figures(October 1, 2003, through June 24, 2004)
Sentencing Information (Pre-Blakely)  

 

Guilty Pleas and Trial Rates Figure C

 

Guilty Pleas and Trials in Each Circuit and District Table 10

 

Guilty Pleas and Trials in Each Primary Offense Category Table 11

 

Distribution of Offenders Receiving Sentencing Options Figure D

 

Offenders Receiving Sentencing Options in Each Primary Offense Category Table 12

 

Average Sentence Length in Each Primary Offense Category Table 13

 

Average Length of Imprisonment for Offenders in Each Criminal History Category by Primary Offense Category Table 14

 

Average Length of Imprisonment in Each General Crime Category Figure E

 

Offenders Receiving Fines and Restitution in Each Primary Offense Category Table 15

 

Type of Sentence Imposed on Offenders in Each Sentencing Zone Table 16

 

Imprisonment Rates of Offenders Eligible for Non-Prison Sentences in Selected Offense Types Figure F
Guideline Application (Pre-Blakely)  

 

Offenders Sentenced for Each Chapter Two Guideline Table 17

 

Offenders Receiving Each Chapter Three Guideline Adjustment Table 18

 

Offenders Receiving Acceptance of Responsibility Reductions in Each Primary Offense Category Table 19

 

Offenders Receiving Chapter Four Criminal History Points Table 20

 

Offenders in Each Offense Level and Criminal History Category Table 21

 

Offenders Receiving Career Offender/Armed Career Criminal Adjustments in Each Primary Offense Category Table 22

 

Offenders in Each Guideline Sentencing Range Table 23
Departures and Sentences Within the Guideline Range (Pre-Blakely)

 

Percent of Offenders Receiving Each Type of Departure Figure G

 

Reasons Given by Sentencing Courts for Departures Above the Guideline Range Table 24

 

Reasons Given by Sentencing Courts for Other Departures Below the Guideline Range Table 25

 

Guideline Departure Rate by Circuit and District Table 26

 

Downward Departure Rate by Circuit and District Table 26A

 

Offenders Receiving Departures in Each Primary Offense Category Table 27

 

Offenders Receiving Downward Departures in Each Primary Offense Category Table 27A

 

Offenders Receiving Departures in Each Primary Sentencing Guideline Table 28

 

Within-Range Cases: Position of Sentence for Offendersin Each Primary Offense Category Table 29

 

Position of Sentence Within Sentencing Range for Selected Offenses Figure H

 

Substantial Assistance Cases: Degree of Departure for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category Table 30

 

Government Sponsored Downward Departure Cases: Degree of Departure for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category Table 31

 

Other Downward Departure Cases: Degree of Departure for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category Table 31A

 

Upward Departure Cases: Degree of Departure for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category Table 32
Drug Cases (Pre-Blakely)  

 

Distribution of Guideline Drug Offenses Figure I

 

Primary Drug Type of Offenders Sentenced Under Each Drug Guideline Table 33

 

Race of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type Table 34

 

Gender of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type Table 35

 

Citizenship of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type Table 36

 

Criminal History Category of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type Table 37

 

Plea and Trial Rates of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type Table 38

 

Weapon Involvement of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type Table 39

 

Role Adjustment of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type Table 40

 

Acceptance of Responsibility of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type Table 41

 

Mean and Median Drug Amounts (In Grams) for Selected Base Offense Levels and Drug Types Table 42

 

Drug Offenders Receiving Mandatory Minimums for Each Drug Type Table 43

 

Drug Offenders Receiving Safety Valve and Mandatory Minimums for Each Drug Type Table 44

 

Drug Offenders Receiving Departures for Each Drug Type Table 45

 

Average Length of Imprisonment in Each Drug Type Figure J

 

Distribution of Drug Type Figure K

 

Mean Length of Imprisonment for Each Drug Type Figure L
Immigration Cases (Pre-Blakely)  

 

Demographic and Offense Information for Immigration Offenses Table 46

 

Age of Offenders Sentenced Under Immigration Guidelines Table 47

 

Citizenship of Offenders Sentenced Under Immigration Guidelines Table 48

 

Criminal History Category and Citizenship of Offenders Sentenced Under Immigration Guidelines Table 49

 

Mean and Median Sentences of Offenders Sentenced under Immigration Guidelines by Departure Status Table 50
Organizational Sentencing Practices (Pre-Blakely)  

 

Organizations Receiving Fines or Restitution by Primary Offense Category and Applicability of Chapter Eight Fine Guidelines Table 51

 

Mean and Median Fine or Restitution Imposed on Sentenced Organizations by Primary Offense Category Table 52

 

Chapter Eight Organizational Sentencing Components Table 53

 

Organizations Sentenced Under Chapter Eight: Culpability Factors Table 54
Sentencing Appeals (Pre-Blakely)  

 

Type and Disposition of Appeals Cases Figure M

 

Guideline Involved in Issues Appealed by the Defendants Table 57

 

Guideline Involved in Issues Appealed by the Government Table 58

 

Sentencing Issues Appealed for Selected Guidelines Table 59
Appendix A (Pre-Blakely)  

 

Descriptions of Datafiles, Variables, and Footnotes  
SECTION THREE: Post-Blakely Tables and Figures(June 25, 2004, through September 30, 2004)
Sentencing Information (Post-Blakely)  

 

Guilty Pleas and Trial Rates Figure C

 

Guilty Pleas and Trials in Each Circuit and District Table 10

 

Guilty Pleas and Trials in Each Primary Offense Category Table 11

 

Distribution of Offenders Receiving Sentencing Options Figure D

 

Offenders Receiving Sentencing Options in Each Primary Offense Category Table 12

 

Average Sentence Length in Each Primary Offense Category Table 13

 

Average Length of Imprisonment for Offenders in Each Criminal History Category by Primary Offense Category Table 14

 

Average Length of Imprisonment in Each General Crime Category Figure E

 

Offenders Receiving Fines and Restitution in Each Primary Offense Category Table 15

 

Type of Sentence Imposed on Offenders in Each Sentencing Zone Table 16

 

Imprisonment Rates of Offenders Eligible for Non-Prison Sentences in Selected Offense Types Figure F
Guideline Application (Post-Blakely)  

 

Offenders Sentenced for Each Chapter Two Guideline Table 17

 

Offenders Receiving Each Chapter Three Guideline Adjustment Table 18

 

Offenders Receiving Acceptance of Responsibility Reductions in Each Primary Offense Category Table 19

 

Offenders Receiving Chapter Four Criminal History Points Table 20

 

Offenders in Each Offense Level and Criminal History Category Table 21

 

Offenders Receiving Career Offender/Armed Career Criminal Adjustments in Each Primary Offense Category Table 22

 

Offenders in Each Guideline Sentencing Range Table 23
Departures and Sentences Within the Guideline Range (Post-Blakely)

 

Percent of Offenders Receiving Each Type of Departure Figure G

 

Reasons Given by Sentencing Courts for Departures Above the Guideline Range Table 24

 

Reasons Given by Sentencing Courts for Other Departures Below the Guideline Range Table 25

 

Guideline Departure Rate by Circuit and District Table 26

 

Downward Departure Rate by Circuit and District Table 26A

 

Offenders Receiving Departures in Each Primary Offense Category Table 27

 

Offenders Receiving Downward Departures in Each Primary Offense Category Table 27A

 

Offenders Receiving Departures in Each Primary Sentencing Guideline Table 28

 

Within-Range Cases: Position of Sentence for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category Table 29

 

Position of Sentence Within Sentencing Range for Selected Offenses Figure H

 

Substantial Assistance Cases: Degree of Departure for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category Table 30

 

Government Sponsored Downward Departure Cases: Degree of Departure for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category Table 31

 

Other Downward Departure Cases: Degree of Departure for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category Table 31A

 

Upward Departure Cases: Degree of Departure for Offenders in Each Primary Offense Category Table 32
Drug Cases (Post-Blakely)  

 

Distribution of Guideline Drug Offenses Figure I

 

Primary Drug Type of Offenders Sentenced Under Each Drug Guideline Table 33

 

Race of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type Table 34

 

Gender of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type Table 35

 

Citizenship of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type Table 36

 

Criminal History Category of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type Table 37

 

Plea and Trial Rates of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type Table 38

 

Weapon Involvement of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type Table 39

 

Role Adjustment of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type Table 40

 

Acceptance of Responsibility of Drug Offenders for Each Drug Type Table 41

 

Mean and Median Drug Amounts (In Grams) for Selected Base Offense Levels and Drug Types Table 42

 

Drug Offenders Receiving Mandatory Minimums for Each Drug Type Table 43

 

Drug Offenders Receiving Safety Valve and Mandatory Minimums for Each Drug Type Table 44

 

Drug Offenders Receiving Departures for Each Drug Type Table 45

 

Average Length of Imprisonment in Each Drug Type Figure J

 

Distribution of Drug Type Figure K

 

Mean Length of Imprisonment for Each Drug Type Figure L
Immigration Cases (Post-Blakely)  

 

Demographic and Offense Information for Immigration Offenses Table 46

 

Age of Offenders Sentenced Under Immigration Guidelines Table 47

 

Citizenship of Offenders Sentenced Under Immigration Guidelines Table 48

 

Criminal History Category and Citizenship of Offenders Sentenced Under Immigration Guidelines Table 49

 

Mean and Median Sentences of Offenders Sentenced under Immigration Guidelines by Departure Status Table 50
Organizational Sentencing Practices (Post-Blakely)  

 

Organizations Receiving Fines or Restitution by Primary Offense Category and Applicability of Chapter Eight Fine Guidelines Table 51

 

Mean and Median Fine or Restitution Imposed on Sentenced Organizations by Primary Offense Category Table 52

 

Chapter Eight Organizational Sentencing Components Table 53

 

Organizations Sentenced Under Chapter Eight: Culpability Factors Table 54
Sentencing Appeals (Post-Blakely)  

 

Type and Disposition of Appeals Cases Figure M

 

Guideline Involved in Issues Appealed by the Defendants Table 57

 

Guideline Involved in Issues Appealed by the Government Table 58

 

Sentencing Issues Appealed for Selected Guidelines Table 59
Appendix A (Post-Blakely)  
  Descriptions of Datafiles, Variables, and Footnotes  
 
APPENDIX B - Pre-Blakely (October 1, 2003, through June 24, 2004) and Post-Blakely (June 25, 2004, through September 30, 2004)
Selected Sentencing Statistics by District  
 
  • National
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Alaska
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Alabama Middle
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Alabama Northern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Alabama Southern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Arkansas Eastern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Arkansas Western
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Arizona
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • California Central
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • California Eastern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • California Northern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • California Southern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Colorado
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Connecticut
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • District of Columbia
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Delaware
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Florida Middle
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Florida Northern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Florida Southern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Georgia Middle
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Georgia Northern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Georgia Southern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Guam
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Hawaii
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Iowa Northern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Iowa Southern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Idaho
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Illinois Central
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Illinois Northern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Illinois Southern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Indiana Northern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Indiana Southern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Kansas
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Kentucky Eastern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Kentucky Western
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Louisiana Eastern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Louisiana Middle
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Louisiana Western
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Massachusetts
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Maryland
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Maine
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Michigan Eastern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Michigan Western
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Minnesota
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Missouri Eastern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Missouri Western
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Mississippi Northern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Mississippi Southern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Montana
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • North Carolina Eastern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • North Carolina Middle
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • North Carolina Western
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • North Dakota
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Nebraska
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • New Hampshire
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • New Jersey
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • New Mexico
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Northern Mariana Islands
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Nevada
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • New York Eastern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • New York Northern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • New York Southern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • New York Western
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Ohio Northern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Ohio Southern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Oklahoma Eastern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Oklahoma Northern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Oklahoma Western
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Oregon
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Pennsylvania Eastern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Pennsylvania Middle
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Pennsylvania Western
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Puerto Rico
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Rhode Island
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • South Carolina
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • South Dakota
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Tennessee Eastern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Tennessee Middle
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Tennessee Western
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Texas Eastern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Texas Northern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Texas Southern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Texas Western
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Utah
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Virginia Eastern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Virginia Western
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Virgin Islands
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Vermont
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Washington Eastern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Washington Western
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Wisconsin Eastern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Wisconsin Western
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • West Virginia Northern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • West Virginia Southern
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely  
 
  • Wyoming
Pre-Blakely Post-Blakely